Are there military exemptions for CLE?

Yes — in many jurisdictions, writing a legal article can qualify for CLE credit if the article is published and meets state MCLE standards.

Most states require that the article provide substantive legal analysis and be published in an approved journal, bar publication, or equivalent outlet.

Details

• CLE boards generally recognize legal writing and publishing as a form of teaching credit.
• The work must demonstrate original legal research or analysis — practice guides, commentaries, or scholarly works are usually eligible.
• Credit is typically calculated based on time reasonably spent researching and writing, subject to jurisdictional caps (for example, some states cap writing credit at 6–12 hours per reporting cycle).
• Drafts, blogs, marketing pieces, or unpublished works generally do not qualify.
• Attorneys must often submit the article and proof of publication to the MCLE board for approval.

Key Takeaway

Yes — writing and publishing a substantive legal article can earn CLE credit, but eligibility, credit hours, and maximum limits vary by jurisdiction, and unpublished or non-substantive works do not count.

No, multi-state CLE credit is not automatic; states determine independently whether they will accept credits earned elsewhere.

Context

Some jurisdictions have reciprocity or acceptance rules for out-of-state CLE, but each jurisdiction may require advance approval, restrict types of credits accepted, or cap the number of credits recognized.

Details

• Reciprocity vs acceptance: Some states automatically accept out-of-state programs; others require provider or course pre-approval.
• Limitations often apply: states may restrict the percentage of credits from non-domestic providers, or exclude certain formats (e.g., webinars, self-study).
• Audit risk: Attorneys relying on reciprocity may be subject to scrutiny during CLE audits.
• Example: Washington allows carryover and credit for programs accredited in other states only if they meet WSBA standards.

Provider Support

• Sprout Education tracks reciprocal rules and helps attorneys choose CLE programs recognized in multiple jurisdictions.

Key Takeaway: Multi-state CLE credit is not universally accepted; it depends on individual state policies and whether the course meets state-specific approval criteria.

Yes – CLE bundles and unlimited memberships are often more cost-effective than purchasing individual courses. Both options let attorneys complete multiple credits at a lower per-credit cost while simplifying compliance with annual or biennial CLE requirements.

Why Bundles and Unlimited Memberships Cost Less

• Volume pricing: Bundles group several courses together at a discounted rate, reducing the per-credit cost.
• Unlimited access: Memberships allow attorneys to take as many approved courses as needed during the membership term, often covering an entire compliance cycle for one flat fee.
• Built-in requirements: Packages and memberships frequently include courses that meet mandatory topics like ethics, professionalism, technology, or bias, removing the need to purchase separate courses.
• Administrative ease: Purchasing one membership or bundle reduces transaction volume and simplifies CLE tracking and reporting.

Considerations Before Buying

• Jurisdiction limits: Some states cap on-demand or recorded credits, so verify that membership access aligns with your state’s live and on-demand credit rules.
• Practice focus: Bundles and membership catalogs may not always include courses specific to your field of law.
• Access period: Both bundles and memberships typically have defined expiration dates—ensure you complete all courses within the term to receive credit.

Sprout Education Support

Sprout Education provides both individual courses and flexible Unlimited Memberships, allowing attorneys to complete their CLE requirements affordably and in full compliance with jurisdictional rules.

Key Takeaway

Unlimited Memberships and CLE bundles both offer substantial savings and convenience. Attorneys seeking flexibility across multiple formats and credit types can often meet all state CLE requirements more efficiently through a single Sprout Education membership.

Yes — in many jurisdictions you can request a deferral, waiver, or modification of your CLE obligations due to medical leave or illness, though it depends on your state’s CLE/MCLE rules. Such relief typically requires submitting a formal application demonstrating medical hardship or incapacity.

Here are how some states handle medical deferrals or hardship:

Typical process & conditions:

1. Submit a written application or petition to the CLE or MCLE board (or the court’s CLE office).
2. Provide medical documentation (doctor’s notes, hospital records, etc.) substantiating the illness or leave.
3. Explain efforts made to comply and why medical leave prevented timely completion.
4. Request either deferral, partial credit reduction, or full waiver/modification.
5. The board may approve relief for a limited period (e.g. one year) or impose conditions (make-up CLE later).
6. If denied, you may be able to appeal or contest the determination (if your state allows) under rules for waivers or noncompliance.

Key Takeaway
Yes — most CLE systems allow for medical leave relief (deferral, waiver, or modification) if you formally apply and document your condition, but whether and how much relief you get depends entirely on your jurisdiction’s rules.

Yes — your employer (or law firm) can manage CLE tracking for you, as long as you retain control over compliance and records, and state rules don’t forbid delegation.
The key is that the CLE record must meet the regulatory body’s requirements (proof, accuracy, auditability), regardless of who tracks it.

Details:

• Many firms build internal systems or use software to track each attorney’s CLE hours, deadlines, courses taken, and credit categories.
• Even if the employer tracks CLE, the attorney remains responsible for verifying credits, submitting reports (if required), and keeping supporting documentation.
• In jurisdictions with audits, the attorney must have original certificates or proof available even if the employer handled tracking.
• If state rules specify that only the individual attorney can report or certify certain CLE, the employer’s tracking must remain supplemental, not a substitution.

Key Takeaway:
Employer-managed tracking is generally acceptable, provided the tracking is accurate, verifiable, and does not violate any state rule that reserves reporting or certification solely for the attorney.

It depends on the jurisdiction — in many states CLE credits do not “expire” simply because they were not reported, but the opportunity to report or obtain credit may lapse under certain rules, audit periods, or statute of limitations.
If reporting deadlines pass, authorities may refuse late credit, disallow retroactive submission, or treat them as forfeited — not because the credit expired, but because the reporting window closed.

Details:

• In Minnesota, lawyers must report CLE attendance by the end of their reporting period; there is no provision to carry over or report old credits outside that period.
• In North Carolina, purchased on-demand CLE programs expire 90 days from the date of purchase (for access to content), though that speaks to content availability rather than the reporting of earned credits.
• Some CLE providers (e.g. Seyfarth) set deadlines for submitting forms tied to the program — if that form is submitted too late, credit might be denied.

Key Takeaway:
Don’t rely on “credit never expires” — even if the CLE itself remains valid, failing to report it timely may prevent you from claiming it, depending on your jurisdiction’s rules.