It depends on the state — in many cases yes, you must report CLE separately to each jurisdiction in which you are licensed (or designate one state as your reporting state), unless a reciprocity or comity provision allows combining reporting.
Your obligations depend on each state’s rules for multi-jurisdictional attorneys, reciprocity, and reporting procedures.
- Idaho allows attorneys whose principal office is out of state to satisfy Idaho’s MCLE by filing a certificate of compliance from another jurisdiction, rather than submitting each individual CLE course to Idaho. https://isb.idaho.gov/licensing-mcle/mcle-info/mcle-compliance/out-of-state-reporting/
- Utah permits attorneys in certain reciprocity states (Idaho, Oregon, Washington) to meet Utah CLE by filing a “Comity Certificate” rather than reporting every CLE separately. https://www.mcleutah.org/lawyers/attorney-faqs/
- California allows attorneys to claim credit for out-of-state CLE that has been approved by an “Approved Jurisdiction,” letting them avoid submitting each session for California approval separately. https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Attorneys/MCLE-CLE/Requirements/Approved-Jurisdictions
- But some states do not accept out-of-state CLE or require you to apply for approval or submit documentation for each session.
Key Takeaway:
You often must report CLE separately in each state where you are subject to MCLE, unless a state’s rules allow you to rely on reciprocity, comity, or a certificate of compliance from one jurisdiction. Always check the CLE rules of each jurisdiction where you are licensed.