Is multi-state CLE credit automatic?

Yes — in many jurisdictions, writing a legal article can qualify for CLE credit if the article is published and meets state MCLE standards.

Most states require that the article provide substantive legal analysis and be published in an approved journal, bar publication, or equivalent outlet.

Details

• CLE boards generally recognize legal writing and publishing as a form of teaching credit.
• The work must demonstrate original legal research or analysis — practice guides, commentaries, or scholarly works are usually eligible.
• Credit is typically calculated based on time reasonably spent researching and writing, subject to jurisdictional caps (for example, some states cap writing credit at 6–12 hours per reporting cycle).
• Drafts, blogs, marketing pieces, or unpublished works generally do not qualify.
• Attorneys must often submit the article and proof of publication to the MCLE board for approval.

Key Takeaway

Yes — writing and publishing a substantive legal article can earn CLE credit, but eligibility, credit hours, and maximum limits vary by jurisdiction, and unpublished or non-substantive works do not count.

Yes — your employer (or law firm) can manage CLE tracking for you, as long as you retain control over compliance and records, and state rules don’t forbid delegation.
The key is that the CLE record must meet the regulatory body’s requirements (proof, accuracy, auditability), regardless of who tracks it.

Details:

• Many firms build internal systems or use software to track each attorney’s CLE hours, deadlines, courses taken, and credit categories.
• Even if the employer tracks CLE, the attorney remains responsible for verifying credits, submitting reports (if required), and keeping supporting documentation.
• In jurisdictions with audits, the attorney must have original certificates or proof available even if the employer handled tracking.
• If state rules specify that only the individual attorney can report or certify certain CLE, the employer’s tracking must remain supplemental, not a substitution.

Key Takeaway:
Employer-managed tracking is generally acceptable, provided the tracking is accurate, verifiable, and does not violate any state rule that reserves reporting or certification solely for the attorney.

It depends on the jurisdiction — in many states CLE credits do not “expire” simply because they were not reported, but the opportunity to report or obtain credit may lapse under certain rules, audit periods, or statute of limitations.
If reporting deadlines pass, authorities may refuse late credit, disallow retroactive submission, or treat them as forfeited — not because the credit expired, but because the reporting window closed.

Details:

• In Minnesota, lawyers must report CLE attendance by the end of their reporting period; there is no provision to carry over or report old credits outside that period.
• In North Carolina, purchased on-demand CLE programs expire 90 days from the date of purchase (for access to content), though that speaks to content availability rather than the reporting of earned credits.
• Some CLE providers (e.g. Seyfarth) set deadlines for submitting forms tied to the program — if that form is submitted too late, credit might be denied.

Key Takeaway:
Don’t rely on “credit never expires” — even if the CLE itself remains valid, failing to report it timely may prevent you from claiming it, depending on your jurisdiction’s rules.

It depends on the provider and the jurisdiction — some CLE “bundles” have expiration or usage deadlines, while others allow credits to be used over time (or even carried forward).
The bundle itself is a purchasing mechanism; whether the underlying credits expire is controlled by state CLE rules, provider policies, or the course’s accreditation period.

Details:

• In Illinois, recorded (on-demand) CLE eligibility expires two years from the date of the program unless otherwise noted.
• Some providers state explicitly that their bundled courses “do not have an expiration date” and unused portions can be carried into the next reporting period.
• Even if a provider promises “no expiration,” the state CLE authority may refuse credit if the course is too old or outside its accreditable period.
• Always check both the provider’s bundle terms and the CLE rules in your state to confirm whether there is an expiration or time limit.

Key Takeaway:
Bundle credits may expire — you must verify both the bundle’s terms and your state’s CLE regulations to know whether unused credits remain valid.

The time allowed to fix a CLE deficiency varies by state, but most jurisdictions provide a short cure or grace period after the reporting deadline. In many states, attorneys have between 30 and 60 days after receiving notice of deficiency to complete missing hours or submit proof. Some states allow formal deficiency plans or extensions, often with late fees or penalties.

Key Takeaway
You generally have 30–60 days (depending on your jurisdiction) to fix a CLE deficiency after the deadline or notice. Always check your state’s MCLE board or Supreme Court rules for the exact cure window.

It depends — bankruptcy attorneys may have specialized CLE requirements or recommended topic tracks tied to bankruptcy law, especially in jurisdictions where certification or specialization rules apply.
Because bankruptcy practice involves complex federal procedures, commercial restructuring, and creditor-debtor dynamics, CLE for bankruptcy attorneys often emphasizes substantive, procedural, and regulatory topics specific to insolvency law.

• In North Carolina, attorneys seeking certification in Bankruptcy Law must complete at least 36 hours of accredited CLE in bankruptcy law over the preceding three years, with a minimum of six hours each year.
• In Louisiana, the Board Certified Bankruptcy Law specialty follows the American Board of Certification (ABC) standards, which include separate CLE requirements beyond general bar compliance.
• Common CLE topics for bankruptcy practitioners include:
    • Chapter 11 reorganization and confirmation issues
    • Avoidance, preference, and fraudulent transfer actions
    • Debtor-in-possession financing and cash collateral use
    • Valuation disputes, cramdowns, and plan modifications
    • Ethical obligations, conflicts of interest, and professional responsibility in bankruptcy practice
    • Federal rule amendments and procedural updates from the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts
• Specialized CLE for bankruptcy law may overlap with, or supplement, general CLE requirements depending on jurisdictional policy.

Key Takeaway
It depends — while not all states impose unique CLE rules for bankruptcy attorneys, those pursuing certification or specialization must often meet additional CLE obligations and focus on advanced bankruptcy topics under their state’s or certifying body’s requirements.