No — judges in Massachusetts do not have a separate, mandatory CLE requirement apart from general attorney education norms.
Massachusetts does not impose a mandatory CLE for attorneys; judges may participate in Judicial Education programs, but those are not required under a distinct CLE mandate.
Details
Yes – in Minnesota you can submit CLE credits online via the Board’s OASIS system.
Minnesota attorneys report CLE either through OASIS or by filing a paper Affidavit of CLE Compliance; the online option is the preferred method.
Details:
Yes — in Missouri, you can submit CLE credits online via The Missouri Bar’s “My MCLE” system.
Attorneys report MCLE hours, check compliance status, and pay any fees through that online reporting portal.
Details:
You report CLE credits in Illinois by checking that your MCLE Board transcript reflects sufficient credits by the June 30 compliance date and by July 31, compliance is confirmed automatically without separate reporting.
Under Illinois’s new transcript-based system, once your transcript shows you are in compliance, no additional submission is required.
Attorneys in Illinois are divided into two compliance groups (A–M and N–Z) and have alternating two-year reporting periods.
Each reporting period requires 30 hours of MCLE credit, including at least 6 hours of Professional Responsibility (PMCLE) — among which must be credits in diversity/inclusion and mental health/substance abuse.
Providers are obligated to report attorney attendance to the MCLE Board by the 15th of the following month after a course.
Illinois’s online transcript system serves as the compliance report: once your transcript shows you have met the requirement, the Board notifies you and no separate filing is necessary.
Attorneys may add qualifying out-of-state or nontraditional credits via the MCLE Board’s website (e.g. for teaching, authorship) and pay required fees.
Newly admitted attorneys have special requirements and deadlines under the NAA rules, which must be reported online via the MCLE Board system.
The difference between live and on-demand CLE is that live CLE happens in real time with instructors and allows interaction, while on-demand CLE is a pre-recorded program that attorneys can watch later at their own pace. Both formats may count toward CLE credit, but state rules often treat them differently.
Key Takeaway: Live CLE provides real-time engagement, while on-demand CLE offers flexibility — and providers like Sprout Education deliver both to help attorneys stay compliant.
No — Maryland has no mandatory CLE requirement at present, so there is no rule imposing in-person or live webcast CLE. The state has studied adopting mandatory CLE, but as of now, compliance is voluntary.
Key Takeaway: Because Maryland does not impose mandatory CLE, there is no obligation to attend live or in-person programs; any future rules would need to specify format requirements.
No — Vermont attorneys do not “submit CLE credits” online in the sense of uploading certificates; instead they certify compliance on a CLE Compliance Form (sent by email) during license renewal.
The Vermont MCLE system relies on that certification, rather than a public portal for credit uploads.
Details:
No — Michigan does not impose a mandatory CLE requirement, so there is no requirement for live webcast or in-person CLE. Because CLE is voluntary, there are likewise no rules mandating format—attorneys may choose whether to engage in in-person, webcast, or self-study CLE for professional development.
Key Takeaway: Because Michigan has no mandatory CLE statutes, there is no obligation to take live webcast or in-person CLE — attorneys may use any format exclusively at their discretion.
No CLE activities currently count toward a mandatory requirement in Maryland, because Maryland has no mandatory CLE credit requirement.
However, many attorneys undertake CLE voluntarily to maintain competence, reputation, and insurance relationships.
Blockchain CLE is continuing legal education focused on blockchain, NFTs, and related legal issues. It helps attorneys understand both the technology and its legal, regulatory, and risk dimensions.
Key Takeaway: Blockchain CLE arms attorneys with both technical and legal insight into a transformative space — and courses like Sprout Education’s help you earn real credit while building competence.
Yes — in Florida you can submit (i.e. self-report) your CLE (CLER) credits online via The Florida Bar’s Member Portal.
You are responsible for reporting your completed CLE courses using the course reference numbers in your online profile. ([flabar.org](https://www.floridabar.org/member/cle/general-cle-info-and-requirements/) )
Details:
Yes — attorneys in Colorado can submit CLE credits online using the Colorado “CLEtrack” system.
Colorado is a self-reporting jurisdiction, so lawyers must certify their own CLE attendance via the online portal.
Details:
Yes – modern technology CLE courses are widely available and focus on emerging topics like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data privacy, e-discovery, and technology ethics.
These courses help attorneys meet evolving competence standards while staying current with digital tools and security practices in law.
| Tech CLE Area | Typical Topics | Why It’s Relevant |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence / Generative AI | Responsible AI use, prompt design, AI-assisted drafting, AI ethics | Attorneys must understand how to use AI tools safely and within ethical boundaries |
| Cybersecurity & Privacy | Data protection, breach response, encryption, compliance | Protecting client data and avoiding malpractice exposure is critical |
| e-Discovery & Predictive Coding | Technology-assisted review (TAR), data analytics, AI-driven discovery | Modern litigation relies heavily on automated document review |
| Technology Ethics & Competence | Duty of tech competence, confidentiality risks, malpractice prevention | Many states require attorneys to maintain technology competence |
| Legal Software & Automation | Practice management systems, workflow automation, document drafting tools | Improves productivity and reduces operational errors |
| Blockchain & Smart Contracts | Legal enforceability, decentralized systems, digital asset management | Emerging technologies are reshaping business and transactional law |
Where to find these CLEs & how jurisdictions support them
– Attorney Credits offers CLE courses like “Top 10 Tips for Working with Tech Companies” and “Five Steps to Protect Your Firm from Catastrophic Cyber Attacks,” which count toward technology or ethics credit in many jurisdictions.
– Sprout Education also features tech-forward CLE programs focusing on AI, cybersecurity, and innovation in law practice.
– Some states, including Florida, now require attorneys to complete technology-related CLE hours as part of their ongoing education requirements.
Caveats & advice
– Always verify that a specific technology CLE is accredited in your jurisdiction.
– Technology
Yes — Texas attorneys can report CLE credits online through “My Bar Page” via the State Bar of Texas’s MCLE reporting tools.
CLE activity sponsors also report attendance electronically, but you may self-report missing credits via approved online means.
Details:
Yes — Washington attorneys can submit (i.e. self-report) many CLE credits online through the WSBA MCLE Online System.
The system allows you to view your transcript, add credits (especially for recorded courses), and certify compliance for your reporting cycle.
Details:
No — Kansas does not allow individual attorneys to enter and submit CLE credits themselves; CLE providers report attendance via the Kansas CLE system.
Kansas attorneys use the MyKSCLE portal to view transcripts, dispute discrepancies, and pay noncompliance fees, but they cannot directly post hours.
Details:
No — Texas does not require CLE to be in person. Attorneys may satisfy their CLE obligation through live webcasts or recorded programs, subject to the state’s self-study rules.
Key Takeaway: In Texas, there is no requirement for in-person attendance — attorneys may use live webcasts or approved recorded/self-study formats to satisfy most or all of their CLE obligation, with the only format restriction being that only up to 3 hours may be self-study.
Yes, CLE on using ChatGPT in legal practice is available, but its acceptance for credit depends on state accreditation. These programs are generally approved under technology, ethics, or practice management categories when they address professional responsibilities connected to AI use.
Key Takeaway: CLE on ChatGPT is available and valid in many states, but attorneys must confirm that the program has been accredited in their jurisdiction under the appropriate credit category.
Yes — in Indiana attorneys can submit CLE attendance via an online portal (Indiana’s Judicial Branch CLE portal).
The portal allows reporting attendance for courses when the provider does not report, and also handles accreditation applications. ([in.gov](https://www.in.gov/courts/help/portal/education/report-cle/))
Details:
Yes — in Delaware attorneys can submit CLE attendance and compliance online via the DESCLMS (Delaware Supreme Court Lawyer Management System).
Delaware’s CLE system requires providers to submit attendance to the Supreme Court and allows attorneys to view transcripts and request credit via DESCLMS.
Details:
